Thursday, April 24, 2008
Merriam-Webster is behind the times
Their "Word of the Year" would have been appropriate--like 10 years ago.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The author:
- David Morris
- San Francisco, CA
- Your friend in time.
Posts of substance:
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(394)
-
▼
April
(51)
- Health insurance prices up
- Rice prices up 35% in SF
- What an anti-torture amendment should look like
- Re: Gas Tax Holiday
- Gas tax holiday
- Building a case
- Clinton the underdog
- This cannot possibly be right
- Responding to Paul Krugman
- Merriam-Webster is behind the times
- So quintessential it hurts
- It's official
- An excellent point
- Off by infinity
- The same mistake again
- Wisdom: received
- New slogan for gingerale
- Obama ex post facto
- Humanity busts out--again
- Last one
- And while we're at it...
- Ed Rendell, ladies and gentlemen
- A depressing view of a journalist's job
- Point-counterpoint
- Unfamiliar game
- Not the most persuasive approach
- Increase unemployment benefits, infrastructure spe...
- Vujacic in a nutshell
- "History will not judge this kindly"
- Superman is a dick
- NYT Lomanizes Chris Matthews of "Hardball"
- McCain's ad
- The Raping of Dr. Seuss
- Rising food prices
- MVP
- Clinton busts out
- A taste of what the Chinese government has to offer
- In defense of caucuses
- Hillary and BSG
- I was in it for the money
- What is honor?
- A landscaping dream deferred
- Live blog: crazy shizit in the Mission!
- Basic fairness
- Comment about cops
- Absolut power
- Democratic libel
- Going out for an English
- The power of a good joke
- No more *gate, please
- Izott better than PBS?!
-
▼
April
(51)
1 comment:
Ugh, that's terrible. Though there are two things I like on that page: their attempt at explaining l33t, and that the word 'sardoodledom' is on the list. That's a pretty good word (though judging by the rest of the list, it seems like a fluke. I mean, conundrum? quixotic? Have people not heard of these words before?)
Post a Comment