Showing posts with label federal budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal budget. Show all posts
Monday, February 1, 2010
Sweet budget proposal interactive graphic thingy
The NYT does it again. Check it out if you want to know what the federal budget is like.
Labels:
federal budget
Monday, November 2, 2009
The federal budget as a reflection of America's character
The amount of defense spending in the federal budget is truly mind-boggling, and, I think, pretty sickening too. This year alone we will be spending $680 billion on defense--not including the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan. Meanwhile we are busy haggling over a health reform bill that will cost a mere $90 billion per year ($900 billion over a 10 year time frame).
I wonder if some day we will have a political culture that is capable of saying "no" to military spending.
I wonder if some day we will have a political culture that is capable of saying "no" to military spending.
Labels:
federal budget,
health care reform,
military
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Obama gets pwned
I was kind of waiting for something like this to crop up after Obama's whole "I'll cut $100 million from the budget" thing:
Well played.
Well played.
Labels:
federal budget,
video
Friday, January 16, 2009
Medicareandsocialsecurity
As Ezra Klein likes to point out, when people talk about the long time fiscal liability of "Social Security and Medicare", it's pretty misleading, because the problem is overwhelmingly with Medicare--specifically, the rising costs of healthcare which is causing it to bust the budget.
For example, check out this excerpt from the Economist:
From this it sounds as though both entitlements are more or less equally to blame for the looming budget crisis. But when you look at the chart that the Economist itself provides, you see a different story:

Believe it or not, those numbers on the right vertical axis are trillions of dollars. Even so, it is easy to see that the trouble is not with Social Security, the costs of which are actually quite stable--it's with Medicare (and the drug benefit), the costs of which have more than doubled over the last eight years (and are continuing to rise precipitously). Conservatives tend to lump the two entirely separate entitlement programs together because it serves their ideological aversion towards entitlement spending in general, but it's important to understand where the real budgetary problems are, and why healthcare reform that reduces healthcare costs is so necessary.
For example, check out this excerpt from the Economist:
Mr Bush’s biggest failure, however, is on entitlements. The ageing of the population, coupled with rapidly rising health-care costs, means that in coming decades Social Security and Medicare benefits will outstrip workers’ payroll contributions by trillions of dollars.
...
Between the Medicare drug benefit and the failure to restore solvency to Social Security, the long-term unfunded cost of America’s programmes for the elderly had last year reached a stratospheric $43 trillion, or 5% of future wages, compared with $13 trillion, or 3% of future wages, in 2000.
From this it sounds as though both entitlements are more or less equally to blame for the looming budget crisis. But when you look at the chart that the Economist itself provides, you see a different story:

Believe it or not, those numbers on the right vertical axis are trillions of dollars. Even so, it is easy to see that the trouble is not with Social Security, the costs of which are actually quite stable--it's with Medicare (and the drug benefit), the costs of which have more than doubled over the last eight years (and are continuing to rise precipitously). Conservatives tend to lump the two entirely separate entitlement programs together because it serves their ideological aversion towards entitlement spending in general, but it's important to understand where the real budgetary problems are, and why healthcare reform that reduces healthcare costs is so necessary.
Labels:
balanced budget,
deficits,
federal budget,
healthcare,
social security
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)